CENTR Registrar Day and CENTR Awards Coming on 8 October

CENTR is to hold its annual pan-European Registrar Day in at The Hotel in Brussels, Belgium, on 8 October. It will be followed by the fourth CENTR Awards, which aim at highlighting country code top-level domain (ccTLD) registry projects, teams and people that make a difference in the domain name industry, and which this year will also mark CENTR’s 20th Anniversary.

CENTR encourages registries and registrars from all over Europe to come together and mix and mingle, exchange on best practices, improve on or create new business relationships and get updates from industry experts. They say to expect a re-run of last year’s successful speed-networking session, as well as a tailored agenda based on feedback and key topics of interest.

To register, CENTR say to reach out to your local ccTLD registry. The draft agenda as published by CENTR is:

9:00 Welcome and introductions

9:10 Registry-registrar speed-networking

10:40 Coffee break

11:10 The role of eIDs in an age of data accuracy

11:30 Domain name market trends

  • Presentation of most recent market trends
  • Panel discussion: zoom-in on SMEs

12:30 Lunch break

14:00 Break-out sessions

  • Registry Lock – what’s new?
  • How are we dealing with online fraud?
  • Incentives (types of incentives, what works, what doesn’t)
  • How can registries and registrars work together to face the changing domain landscape?

15:00 Plenary: outcome of break-out session discussions

15:30 Coffee break

16:00 EU Policy Update

16:30 The future of the domain name industry – open mic session

17:00 End

Neustar Says Hello.vu As It’s Appointed Registry For Vanuatu’s ccTLD

Neustar has been appointed as registry operator for Vanuatu’s ccTLD, .vu, by the Office of the Vanuatu Telecommunications, Radiocommunications and Broadcasting Regulator (TRBR) following a competitive tender process. Adding .vu to Neustar’s growing stable of TLDs follows their appointment to run India’s ccTLD earlier this year.

The process of awarding the registry contract started in 2016 when the Vanuatu government passed legislation relating to .vu that would lead to deregulation as well as an upgraded IANA process for redelegation that previously took many years to complete. There had also been deregulation of Vanuatu’s telecommunications space which had seen costs go down by around 80%, so the government was keenly away deregulation could bring benefits. Vanuatu has a population of around 276,000 for the Pacific island east of the northern part of Australia.

“In seeking a new Registry Operator for the .vu namespace, we sought an organisation that would act as a true partner to TRBR in managing and administering .vu in the interests of the Vanuatu Internet Community, as well as the Internet-using community globally,” said TRBR Regulator, Mr Brian Winji.

“Neustar’s credentials in TLD operations and marketing, DNS security and performance, policy development and more, uniquely position it to support TRBR in increasing .vu domain name registrations through enhanced promotions, technical innovation and security.”

“We look forward to working with Neustar in this next stage of .vu’s evolution, and benefiting from Neustar’s demonstrated experience in ccTLD management and strong reputation in the industry as an organisation of integrity and professionalism.”

Vanuatu’s ccTLD, with around 1,500 to 2,000 registrations, nobody seems to know for sure, has been notable in recent years for a less than stellar service for registrants and it was something the government was keen to improve. The less than stellar service meant the registry wasn’t reliable saw local businesses and others look abroad when registering their domain names. So a consultation process began with various internet groups who were supportive of change and to allow Vanuatu companies and organisations to sell domain names.

Now, with Neustar Vanuatu Limited, a subsidiary of Neustar, Inc, as a reliable registry operator .vu is looking to expand and will continue to be available to registrants around the world. But now it will be able to add security and stability to having a visually appealing top-level domain to appeal to registrants.

While the addition of .vu will add little to domains under management, it is undoubtedly of strategic value and will demonstrate that despite their size, Neustar is capable and willing to operate TLDs of any size. Today Neustar operates the back-end technology and marketing for several ccTLDs around the world, including .co (Colombia), .us (United States) and .in (India). In addition, they operate and support a large portfolio of generic TLDs, including the fastest-growing city TLD .nyc, and other high-profile domains like .biz. In total, they support almost 240 TLDs and 15 million domain names around the world.

Radix Sells $1.36m In Premium Domains in 6 Months

Radix released a report on the sale of premium domain names across their new gTLDs from January to June this week, with over 80 domain names sold for more than $2,500, and 3 for more than $10,000, and overall grossing $1,360,865, a similar figure to the second half of 2018.

Radix, which according to nTLDstats, is the largest new gTLD registry with 4.704 million domain names under management across their 9 new generic top level domains. They have 2 new gTLDs with more than one million DUM: .site (1.577m) and .online (1.295m).

Unsurprisingly, these 2 were among the 3 highest-grossing new gTLDs with respect to premium sales selling 61 domains for $65,7600 for .site and 183 domains for $156,320 for .online, the other being .tech (158 domains for $151,936), which is their seventh largest with 252,000. For .space, there were 101 sales totalling $40,922.

The report also shows new premium registrations contributed to around 40% of the total premium revenue for this period and the highest new premium registrations were attributed to GoDaddy at 46% of total premium sales.

There’s also a decent renewal rate for premium domain names of 78% for those registered in or before 2018 and over half (54%) of premium domains registered in the first half of 2018 were renewed.

During the first half of 2019, gaming.tech was the highest one time sale selling for $20,000 through Sedo.

Radix Registry’s premium domain name sales for the first half of 2019 infographic

auDA Rudderless As CEO “Resignation” Follows Chair’s Walk Out

Tuesday’s sudden departure of the auDA CEO comes during a protracted period of turmoil at the .au policy and regulatory body and leaves nobody at the .au policy and regulatory body in positions to make key decisions on policy, marketing or spending, and with the introduction of second level registrations looming in the fourth quarter of 2019, the new rules still haven’t been announced.

auDA logo

Tuesday’s sudden departure of the auDA CEO comes during a protracted period of turmoil at the .au policy and regulatory body and leaves nobody at the .au policy and regulatory body in positions to make key decisions on policy, marketing or spending, and with the introduction of second level registrations looming in the fourth quarter of 2019, the new rules still haven’t been announced.

In what can only be described as a tribute that was over the top in its praise of the controversial CEO, himself appointed after the controversial ousting of the founding CEO Chris Disspain, the auDA statement announcing Boardman’s departure gushes on his achievements, including “development and implementation of new Licensing Rules for .au second-level domain names, and the introduction of direct registration of .au.” With second level registrations due to be introduced within a few months and despite the auDA Board’s inference that Boardman’s “job is done” there is still much to do. Boardman himself said in the recent auDA Quarterly Report: Q2 2019 report that:

The biggest project on auDA’s immediate horizon is the implementation of second level registrations as recommended by the Policy Review Panel. Key to its delivery is the development of a national marketing and public awareness campaign which will build upon the public awareness generated during the policy development process. This project will be the biggest marketing project in auDA’s history and involves not just the uptake of second level .au names, but also building a comprehensive brand for the .au domain more widely.

Registrars are seething as policies and procedures are still to be implemented and end users, for the ones with an interest, are even less well informed. However registrars are reticent to speak on the record due to contractual arrangements. But Domain Pulse is aware of lists of complaints from registrars sent to auDA which appear to be never acted upon. And with the upcoming introduction of second level registrations, Boardman had promised on several occasions that all current registrants would be contacted, and yet it still hasn’t happened. With no CEO and Chair, one wonders what the future is for second level registrations as policies haven’t been finalised and little implemented.

It begs the question, why would Boardman leave of his own volition with still so much to do? Sources have indicated that of course, he didn’t actually resign but his hand was forced by a “reluctant” Board that certainly wouldn’t like having to go public with an ugly termination from a company that is already under the microscope of the Department of Communications and the internet using public.

Incredibly, the announcement saw no interim CEO announced at what, for end users at least, is leading up to the biggest change in the organisation’s history with the implementation of second level registrations.

Bruce Tonkin, the current COO, should have been a walk up start for the CEO position, especially after the plaudits he received in the Statement from the Board. Again, why wasn’t he? Or was there an issue and auDA would have been faced with 2 “resignations”?

Whatever is going on it once again showcases an inept Board and casts a dark shadow over the conduct of the Executive. It’s not like it was the first time either: there have been allegations Board meeting minutes have been altered after publication, sackings of staff members that spoke out against the CEO’s activities, the former Company Secretary compiled a report that ultimately led to their effective sacking and also in Boardman’s suspension of employment. All of these things highlight a pattern of concern for the Department of Communications and the Arts and the domain name community as a whole.

Boardman’s departure comes just 6 weeks after Chair Chris Leptos departed and a terse announcement that followed his abrupt departure. The departure of both means there is no Chair or CEO. Just the “current executive team [who] will collectively carry out the CEO’s responsibilities.” A recent Quarterly Report makes no mention of Leptos and his departure. It will be interesting to see if the same treatment is applied to the departing CEO upon his departure.

Then there’s the reconstitution of the auDA Board, a process that was announced on the same day as the Chair’s abrupt departure. The new Board is to consist of 6 independent directors, one of whom will be the independent Chair, plus 4 elected directors. So, in short order, we will have a new Chair, a new CEO and a new Board, right at the time when .au is going through its single biggest change. Is it time for the current auDA Board, all of which have been tarnished by Boardman, to resign and for the Department of Communications and the Arts to take a stronger position in the future of the .au namespace? It is just too damn important to leave in in the hands of the incompetent and the inept.

Going forward, what of auDA? One can expect their first test in the international community will be the APTLD meeting in Malaysia in September. And then because of the Sri Lankan bombings, auDA is hosting the APTLD meeting in February 2020. There’s also an ICANN community meeting to be held in November 2019 which auDA is hosting. There is also the lack of input in the international community. As far as Domain Pulse can ascertain, auDA is contributing to zero ICANN working groups when they used to be such a contributor. They do have a Strategic Adviser, Head of Government Affairs. But when asked Wednesday if his job was ever advertised and if so where, Domain Pulse received zero response.

So what do we know about Boardman’s “resignation”? As usual in the way auDA works since late 2016, accountability and transparency are sorely lacking, and stakeholders are kept in the dark. Following the “resignation”, it would a travesty if once again this not-for profit was engaged in another golden handshake, several of which have been paid to former employees forced out in recent years. We also have an organisation that has nobody in place that can make key decisions, including on marketing and spending. And the biggest change for .au since auDA was formed almost 2 decades ago, the introduction of second level registrations, is looking dead in the water.

.ICU and .VIP Join the Million Domain Names Club

In recent weeks .icu and .vip achieved the one million domain names under management milestone making it 7 new gTLDs to currently have achieved the milestone.

For .icu, it’s been a meteoric rise having only launched general availability in May 2018 and reaching one million registrations only 13 months later. It’s one of the cheaper top-level domains around, but still managed to avoid any drop in total registrations as first year renewals came around.

For .vip, it took just over 3 years to achieve the one million registrations mark and unlike .vip, has had a few dips along the way.

The new gTLDs that currently have more than one million registrations according to nTLDstats are .top (3.474 million), .xyz (2.399m), .club (1.611m), .site (1.568m), .online (1.290m) followed by .icu and .vip. Another to have achieved the one million registrations was .loan, which now has 910,500, but peaked at 2.5 million in May 2018.

For .icu, while registrations have continually increased, it’s also one of the most abused top-level domains according to Spamhaus. In the latest Spamhaus Botnet Threat Update: Q2-2019, .icu is the 16th most abused TLD and is third among new gTLDs with 72 domain names detected. The TLD with the most domain names considered abusive by Spamhaus was .com, with 1,778 followed by .ru with 731.

.CO Celebrates 9th Birthday

Colombia’s ccTLD has been around a lot longer than 9 years, but 9 years ago when there were only 28,000 .co domain names, all of them registered within Colombia, there was a big change. Eligibility rules were liberalised and .co today is treated as a gTLD rather than a ccTLD and there are now more than 2.3 million domain names registered.

In a post on the go.co blog, thanks is given “to the great vision and forward-thinking of Colombia’s Ministry of Information Technologies and Communications (MINTIC), and a liberalised set of registration policies, on July 20th 2010, the registration restrictions were lifted on second-level .CO domains, effectively opening up the namespace to the entire world. This happened to coincide with Colombia’s Independence Day, so celebration was in the air among the .CO team.”

Prior to July 2010 the only way to register a .co domain name was by being a resident of Colombia.

Today those 2.3 million .co domain names for Colombia’s country code top level domain are registered in nearly 200 countries and territories worldwide. And over the years, a lot of the seeds that started out with us have grown into mighty oaks, including Angel List (angel.co), 500 Startups (500.co), Twitter (t.co), Common Bond (commonbond.co), WeWork (we.co), Rebel Girls (rebelgirls.co), Mirror (mirror.co), Fitpal (fitpal.co), and, well, millions more!

MMX: Registrations and Sales Up, ICM’s Adult Domains Stabilised and .LONDON Out

Minds + Machines Group (MMX) released its half yearly trading results to 30 June last week. In the first half of 2019m MMX reported a healthy year-on-year growth in registrations, up 19% to 1.82 million.

There was also strong channel growth within the original 28 MMX new gTLDs with new sales billings through the channel up 30%. The historic decline in the ICM adult portfolio (.adult, .porn, .sex, and .xxx), which had seen a 16% decline in billings in the corresponding first half of 2018 (compared to 2017), has been fully stabilised at $2.8million (H1 2018: $2.8million). MMX management believes there is now a clear pathway to drive future growth from the ICM portfolio with significant improvements achieved in three of the four ICM properties in the first half of 2018. Compared to the same period last year there had been decline, with further new initiatives coming online in the third quarter of 2019. Importantly, cash-inflows for the period were ahead of expectations at $8.6million (H1 2018 $6.3million) with cash generated of $3.6million including the receipt of $1.6million from contested gTLD auctions (H1 2018 cash generation net of auction proceeds: $0.5million).

“Whilst we are not upgrading guidance for the full year at this stage, we are extremely encouraged by the progress made in the first half,” said Toby Hall, CEO of MMX. “Our revenues are increasingly predictable, with healthy channel sales and strong renewal revenues now driving the business forward. With the legacy onerous contract issue now in the process of being resolved and innovation-based activity supplementing our organic growth, the outlook is bright.”

Currently MMX manages 30 new gTLDs, 28 of them in General Availability, with 1.9 million domain names under management according to nTLDstats. The largest by registration numbers is .vip with 1.023 million registrations.

MMX also addressed “the ongoing drag of one of its legacy contracts against which it had made an onerous provision in the first half of 2018 of $7.0 million in addition to the $2.1 million contractual marketing commitment, bringing the total liability to $9.1million at that time. It has been reported that this legacy contract was with the .london operators. The new gTLD for the UK’s capital peaked at around 86,500 in April 2018 and has been on a downhill slide ever since to today’s 50,700 registrations.

Currently, the estimated liability relating to .london stands at $7.9million. In the half yearly report MMX reports they’ve reached an in principle agreement that it will make a one-off payment of about $5.1m as full and final settlement for any further liability or contractual spend offset by revised contract terms which the Directors now estimate will generate net revenues of approximately $0.5million to MMX over the remaining contractual period. Binding legal contract and payment is expected in H2 and given the positive outlook can be made from the Company’s existing cash resources.

There was also strong channel growth within the original 28 MMX new gTLDs with new sales billings through the channel up 30%. The historic decline in the ICM adult portfolio (.adult, .porn, .sex, and .xxx), which had seen a 16% decline in billings in the corresponding first half of 2018 (compared to 2017), has been fully stabilised at $2.8million (H1 2018: $2.8million). MMX management believes there is now a clear pathway to drive future growth from the ICM portfolio with significant improvements achieved in three of the four ICM properties in the first half of 2018. Compared to the same period last year there had been decline, with further new initiatives coming online in the third quarter of 2019. Importantly, cash-inflows for the period were ahead of expectations at $8.6million (H1 2018 $6.3million) with cash generated of $3.6million including the receipt of $1.6million from contested gTLD auctions (H1 2018 cash generation net of auction proceeds: $0.5million).

“Whilst we are not upgrading guidance for the full year at this stage, we are extremely encouraged by the progress made in the first half,” said Toby Hall, CEO of MMX. “Our revenues are increasingly predictable, with healthy channel sales and strong renewal revenues now driving the business forward. With the legacy onerous contract issue now in the process of being resolved and innovation-based activity supplementing our organic growth, the outlook is bright.”

MMX also addressed “the ongoing drag of one of its legacy contracts against which it had made an onerous provision in the first half of 2018 of $7.0 million in addition to the $2.1 million contractual marketing commitment, bringing the total liability to $9.1million at that time. It has been reported that this legacy contract was with the .london operators. Currently, the estimated liability stands at $7.9million. In the half yearly report MMX reports they’ve reached an in principle agreement that it will make a one-off payment of about $5.1m as full and final settlement for any further liability or contractual spend offset by revised contract terms which the Directors now estimate will generate net revenues of approximately $0.5million to MMX over the remaining contractual period. Binding legal contract and payment is expected in H2 and given the positive outlook can be made from the Company’s existing cash resources.

.ID Coming to Everyone, Everywhere

Registrations under the Indonesian ccTLD .id will be available to everyone, everywhere, by the end of 2019, PANDI announced last week. Currently 96% of the 318,000 registrations are to Indonesians, 4% to registrants abroad.

The policy and regulatory body for .id, PANDI, wants to tap into .id being a useful domain name ending for “idea” or “identification” following moves by the Colombia (.co), Montenegro (.me), and Tuvalu (.tv) who have seen their ccTLDs become in effect gTLDs. Over the next few years they are expecting a rapid increase in registrations. To help grow registrations, PANDI is looking to expand its registrar base around the world with discussion to take place with the government on how to go about this. There will also be support 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.

As part of the move, PANDI is also ensuring that their policies are in compliance with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

According to a report in The Jakarta Post, PANDI hopes to achieve 800,000 registrations by the end of 2019 and to have a “50/50 division between domestic and foreign registrants.”

As a ccTLD of Indonesia, the use of .id will be subject to the laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia, so PANDI may also reject registrations, temporarily disabling them or deleting domain names that violate Indonesian legislation.

Neustar’s Nicolai Bezsonoff Discusses The “Vote of Confidence” In Being Awarded 10 More Years of .US

Last week Neustar was awarded a contract to continue operating the .us registry until 2029, which Neustar views as a “vote of confidence” in their “work thus far with .US, as well as the expertise and capabilities of our team and our infrastructure.” Domain Pulse spoke to Nicolai Bezsonoff, Vice President and General Manager of Registry Solutions at Neustar about what the announcement means to Neustar, the importance of security not just with .us but with all their TLDs, combatting abuse, reaching target audiences and how to combat .com in the US.

Domain Pulse: This contract will take Neustar’s operation as the .us registry past 20 years and in many ways it’s been a silent success. What are Neustar’s plans to continue .us’ growth during the next many years?

Nicolai Bezsonoff: We’re really proud of the long-standing relationship and productive partnership we have built with the NTIA, and we’re thrilled to have received this vote of confidence in our work thus far with .US, as well as the expertise and capabilities of our team and our infrastructure.
That said, we’re certainly not resting on our laurels. As we have done for many years, the next phase of .US will involve a continual cycle of innovating and investment to expand our markets, refine our messaging, implement creative marketing campaigns, engage more deeply with our community, stay abreast of the latest opportunities in marketing and digital, and form meaningful, productive partnerships with organizations that can help us spread awareness and inspire use of the .US domain.

More broadly, over the last few years Neustar Registry has been investing heavily in its DNS and DDoS mitigation capabilities as well as policies and procedures to tackle domain abuse and other cybersecurity concerns, in collaboration with experts and authorities around the world. Our emphasis on security is in turn helping us build a more resilient, robust and trustworthy Registry offering for all our TLDs, .US included, and I suspect is a big part of the reason why other ccTLDs such as .IN and .CO also trust Neustar to protect their critical infrastructure.

This innovation in how we operate and market .US, as well as continually securing and improving performance of our Registry and our TLDs, will ensure the continued value of .US domains for our Registrants – ultimately encouraging loyalty and driving new registrations.

DP: .us has had to compete for awareness against generic top-level domains, particularly .com but also .net and many of the new gTLDs – how have you made .us stand out and be noticed when .com in particular is all many Americans think of?

NB: That’s a really fair question – and to be honest, it’s something that all Registries face in some way or another. Particularly with the increased competition created by new TLDs but even outside this; when there is a choice for consumers to make, then you have to offer something the others don’t. And in truth, that is one of the biggest challenges for our industry.

Firstly, to address .com – it is the dominant industry player for many reasons – most obviously that it had a massive first mover advantage. The .com domain had already been successfully deployed in the United States for many years before the .US country code TLD ever launched.
What we’ve always aimed to do with .US, and will continue to be a key focus moving forward, is to give American consumers an alternative that ticks a few additional boxes. The same logic applies to new TLDs – one of the main goals of the new TLD program was to provide greater consumer choice, and that simply means we need to build a strategy that makes .US a strong and convincing choice for our target market. Choice is ultimately a good thing for our industry, benefiting our customers and keeping us as Registry Operators accountable while also driving creativity and innovation.

Getting a certain domain at a certain price is only one part of the picture, and while some customers will only want to look at this, for those wanting to explore their options then we’re proud to offer a namespace that is stable and authoritative. We’ve worked hard (and will continue to do so) to make sure .US is one of the safest, most secure and trusted domains in the world. This includes everything from our leading and continually-evolving DNS and DDoS capabilities, to our proactive work regarding domain name and DNS abuse. We believe this kind of development and innovation provides additional layers of service to .US domain registrants that perhaps you won’t get from other namespaces that charge a dollar a domain.

Beyond this, while it’s not a “new” TLD, .US still has drastically fewer domains registered than .com which means greater availability of meaningful names. And even though .com is fairly synonymous with U.S. websites, .US has the branding advantage of actually having “US” in the domain itself, which is a primary selling point for many of our Registrants.
The last point I’ll make, but a very important one, is that we also have a fantastic marketing team that works very hard to spread awareness, growth and use of the .US domain, and we’re continually developing new, creative campaigns to broaden our market and reach new customers.

DP: Many ccTLDs around the world are struggling for growth – maintaining registrations but finding the market somewhat saturated. How has Neustar found the market for .us?

NB: Finding a target market for a ccTLD like .US is both a blessing and a curse – technically the entire United States is our potential audience, but realistically we need to be strategic about who we’re speaking to and what message they want to hear.

Over many years we’ve developed a ‘micro-targeting’ approach, focusing on specific, targetable audience groups and crafting dedicated messaging for each, then reaching them through really pinpointed channels and platforms.

The ‘.US market’ contains everything from small business (really our bread-and-butter), to political candidates and activists, to community organizations and causes.

That said, we have to remain innovative and nimble to keep up. One approach we developed to grow new markets was to lean into using .US in reference to the word “us” rather than just an acronym for the United States. From this, we’ve found a new and engaged audience in both families registering domains for family websites or email addresses, and engaged couples finding a creative address for their wedding website.

My colleague, Lori Anne Wardi, recently wrote an article in Domain Name Wire that shares more of the specifics about .US marketing [which is available here].

Building a strong product that is differentiated from our competitors is one thing, but ensuring we’re deliberate and targeted in the way we promote .US is another key part of the equation if we want to ensure the continued success of .US.

DP: Over the last 18 years Neustar has managed .us, what have been some of the highlights?

NB: When it comes to the internet, 18 is a lot of years! I think of internet years a lot like dog years, every 1 year is really equal to more like 7 years of change and evolution. Some of my favorite highlights during this (very long) time have been:

  • Being given the honor 18 years ago to work side by side with the U.S. Government to run this unique public resource and critical piece of internet infrastructure representing the United States of America;
  • Hitting the 1 million – then the 2 million — domain names under management milestones – and knowing that we were able to achieve these numbers by safely and responsibly growing the namespace;
  • Despite operating in a far more competitive and complex market since the launch of the new gTLD program, continuing to grow the number of .us domain names under management by tapping into new and creative markets;
  • The effective launch of the .US Stakeholder Council in 2014, and today, effectively operating the .US domain as a multi-stakeholder endeavor, with the support and engagement of both internal and external stakeholders (including domain name organizations, consumer groups, industry organizations, registrars, the U.S. Government, law enforcement agencies and global internet users, etc.);
  • Very recently, partnering with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the DOC to build proactive measures to address the sale of illegal opioids in the .US namespace, and in other TLDs too;
  • Our many creative marketing campaigns we’ve run for the .US domain – I’ve loved so many of them, but last year we launched my absolute favorite, The Story of .US video campaign. You can watch it on the about.us website here: www.about.us/whos-on-us;
  • And of course, I must confess that a highlight of our time managing the .US domain was getting the great news that our contract would be renewed!

DP: Looking ahead, what changes and initiatives are you planning for .us?

NB: Fundamentally, the success of .US so far has taught us some valuable lessons in what works, and what doesn’t, and we’re lucky to have an established reputation, strong industry partnerships and an engaged customer base – so we’re certainly not in favor of ‘change for the sake of change’.

That said, as I’ve mentioned, we are always open to innovation and experimentation to remain secure, fresh and relevant. Specifically for the .US domain, we have a number of upcoming campaigns for new ‘micro-target’ audiences (can’t give away too many details just yet!). As part of this we’re implementing a really broad range of marketing activities – everything from podcasts to eBooks to video to event sponsorships to make sure we’re reaching our audiences on the platforms and channels they actually use.

Ultimately, our overarching goals are to drive meaningful increases in consumer awareness of the .US Top-Level Domain, to generate new registrations, and to inspire development and usage through our end-to-end marketing campaign strategies.

We’re excited to continue driving .US brand affinity and awareness for everyone with a dream, idea or business made for the USA.

ZADNA Fires CEO Vika Mpisane

South Africa’s ccTLD manager the .ZA Domain Name Authority (ZADNA) has terminated their CEO Vika Mpisane effective 16 July 2019, according to a report in the South African MyBroadband, and follows a lengthy disciplinary process which began in January.

“Motlatjo Ralefatane, the chairperson of ZADNA’s board, announced Mpisane’s axing in a letter sent to members of the organisation dated 17 July,” reports MyBroadband.

Mpisane was originally suspended in May after industry sources informed MyBroadband that an acting CEO had been at ZADNA’s helm since December with no official notification from the organisation.

“Ralefatane explained that ZADNA had been locked in a disciplinary hearing with Mpisane for months, as he was constantly delaying the process,” according to the report.

“Mr Vika Mpisane was suspended for serious hybrid acts of misconduct including mismanagement of ZADNA funds and others,” Ralefatane told MyBroadband at the time. Ralefatane said that Mpisane was suspended on 5 December 2018.

MyBroadband asked Mpisane whether he would fight the outcome of the disciplinary hearing and his termination, but he did not respond to requests for comment. He has also not responded to any of MyBroadband’s multiple requests for comment on this matter since May.

At the time of writing, Mpisane was still listed on the ZADNA website as being the organisation’s CEO. According to Mpisane’s bio on ZADNA’s website he’s served in the Board of Directors (Excom) of Africa Top Level Domains (AfTLD) – the association of African ccTLDs since 2006. Since 2009 he’s served as the AfTLD’s President/Chairman, and has (since 2010) provided leadership of AfTLD’s positioning & involvement in the dotAfrica project. He was elected into the council of the ICANN country code Names Supporting Organisation (ccNSO) in 2009 and continues as the ccNSO councillor until 2015. In the council, he is involved in its ccNSO Meetings Program Working Group (WG) and Finance WG.