Adrian Kinderis, CEO of ARI Registry Services, says Super Bowl 2013 showed a brandâs domain name and Twitter handles were the dominant call to actions for the worldâs leading advertisers â a fact that bodes well for the introduction of .brand Top-Level Domains in traditional advertising mediums
There is no surprise that marketers, advertisers and consumers pay close attention to Super Bowl ads. A Super Bowl campaign provides a brand with the opportunity to shine like no other event in the world, entertaining millions through the discipline of insightful, creative advertising.
Last year one trend in particular caught my attention â the common call to action used by advertisers to drive a response from consumers. My brilliant team of data crunchers found 49% of Super Bowl 2012 ads directed viewers to a corporate website address â above all other social media channels such as Facebook (11%) and Twitter (9%).
So when Super Bowl Sunday came around this year, I was intrigued to see what my teamâs analysis would yield. Would domain names still remain dominant despite the growing popularity of social media?
Interestingly, out of the 73 ads that aired this year, domain names prevailed again as the preferred call to action used by advertisers, with 40% of ads containing a traditional web address. On the social media front, it was Twitter that dominated the playing field with 34% of ads featuring a Twitter handle or hashtag â a monumental jump of more than 300% from last year. In contrast, Facebook remained âon the benchâ with only 11% of mentions in Super Bowl commercials and Google+ was clearly stuck in the locker room with not a single mention.
With 108.4 million viewers, Super Bowl 2013 was one of the highest rating programs in the US, making the advertising slots some of the most valuable in the world. Reports suggest advertisers spent up to a record $3.8 million for each 30-second slot, with GoDaddy, Samsung, Audi, Century 21, Hyundai and Fiat amongst the many regular players.
For $3.8 million Iâm guessing advertisers were hoping for a strong return on investment â and with so much riding on the success of each ad, the call to action driving the advertising message is clearly vitally important. The fact that domain names were the most popular call to action for two years running proves that advertisers prefer to drive an audience to a website for a purer, controlled brand experience.
The reality is that social media does not present the same level of certainty as a website. Despite âthe impressive growth this year of Twitter mentions, this was normally in conjunction with another call to action such as a domain name. For example, Disney and Fiat featured both website addresses and Twitter handles (one to drive a brand experience, the other to create a conversation). Super Bowl ad veteran GoDaddy advertised with just their domain name last year, but added Twitter as an additional call to action this year. This is an interesting move from an organization whose business is the sale of domain names. Iâd suggest this addresses a requirement to create brand engagement at times when a domain name purchase isnât on the cards.
Intriguingly, only 19% of ads featured a Twitter handle or hashtag as the only call to action â compared to 25% for domain names. Hyundai and Century 21 were the biggest domain name fanatics, advertising with their website addresses only in both Super Bowl 2012 and 2013, while we found a Twitter devotee in Audi, who used Twitter as their sole call to action for both years.Â The case was even bleaker for Facebook, with only 4% of ads featuring Facebook as the sole call to action (Pepsi was a lone ranger here). In fact, Samsung went so far as to drop their Facebook call to action from their 2012 ads in favour of Twitter this year â perhaps a recognition of the channelâs ability to attract online conversations around the worldâs biggest events, be it sport, politics or a natural disaster.
For now, itâs clear that brands still see websites as their core digital asset â the quarterbacks of a brandâs digital strategy you might say.
What trends will we see in future ads?
Despite the increasing trend for brands integrating their content through social media channels, my prediction is that websites, driven by intuitive and easy to recall website addresses will continue to remain the primary point of brand engagement for many of the worldâs leading brands. Websites provide a level of control, interaction and measurability that social media just cannot match when considering brand experience, product immersion or direct response.
To support this, many global brands have invested in their their own branded slice of the Internet to allow for greater levels of engagement between their online content and their target audiences. And they are only just around the cornerâ¦
The new Top-Level Domain program
The global regulator of domain names, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), is getting ready to roll out its new Top-Level Domain program later this year. The program will see those that applied move beyond the traditional .com to .brand in a dramatic shift that will introduce a new platform for innovation, increased simplicity and recall for the domain name landscape.
Moving from samsung.com to .samsung for example, this unique slice of Internet real estate will change the way consumers around the world navigate to find online content, as well as reducing the reliance upon unwieldy forward slashes (/) to create an online call to action.
A .brand Top-Level Domain will allow trust, leadership, customer engagement and improved message recall to shine through by providing a direct connection between the customer and the brand experience â creating your very own branded âwalled gardenâ. This will deliver the same control and measurability seen in traditional domain names, but it will provide new avenues for creativity, freedom and simplicity.
What impact will this have on Super Bowl ads in the future?
For those brands who have applied, a new Top-Level Domain will have a unique differentiator within the online space at their disposal â an asset that creates memorable, succinct domain name structures that will increase customer response and engagement from traditional advertising activity.
I suspect next yearâs Super Bowl advertisers will be closely watching the new Top-Level Domain program and investigating the possibility of including a .brand Top-Level Domain when itâs their time to shine on the global scale. Dell, Toyota, and Samsung all advertised this year and all applied for a new Top-Level Domain. Their chance to innovate is just around the corner.
Just imagine seeing ads driving viewers to visit rav4.toyota, achieve.dell or galaxy.samsung in next yearâs Super Bowl? Seems just little bit more compelling than âfollow us on Twitterâ.
This article by Adrian Kinderis, CEO of ARI Registry Services, was sourced with permission from: